[ad_1]
Former President Trump is seen at his Mar-a-Lago residence on Nov. 15, 2022, in Palm Seashore, Florida. Photograph: Joe Raedle/Getty Photographs
A New York choose on Friday declined to throw out state Lawyer Common Letitia James‘ civil lawsuit in opposition to former President Trump, per the New York Times.
The large image: It is the legal professional normal’s newest victory in opposition to Trump and makes it extra probably the previous president must face trial later this yr.
Driving the information: Justice Arthur F. Engoron of the State Supreme Court docket in Manhattan denied Trump’s movement to dismiss the case, saying a number of the arguments repeatedly made by the previous president’s legal professionals had been “frivolous” and had been “borderline frivolous even the primary time defendants made them.”
- The choose additionally rejected a separate try by Ivanka Trump — a defendant within the lawsuit — to dismiss the accusations in opposition to her.
State of play: In November, the identical choose sided with James in her bid for an independent monitor to supervise the Trump Group’s preparation of monetary statements amid pending assessment of the civil lawsuit.
- Engoron set a trial date of Oct. 2, 2023, over the objections of the Trumps’ legal professionals.
- At the moment, the protection attorneys filed a number of motions to dismiss, and Engoron rejected all of them.
Catch up fast: James filed a civil lawsuit in September, accusing Trump and members of his household of monetary fraud and referring them to federal prosecutors and the IRS for legal investigation.
- The suit alleges the previous president “falsely inflated his web value by billions of {dollars}.”
- The AG is in search of to completely bar Trump, Donald Trump Jr., Ivanka Trump and Eric Trump — all named within the swimsuit — from serving as an officer or director of a enterprise registered in New York state.
- James can also be in search of a $250 million judgment.
In the meantime, Trump has filed his personal lawsuits against James, alleging that she’s abused her place and launched into a “warfare of intimidation and harassment” in opposition to him.
What they’re saying: “As soon as once more, Donald Trump’s makes an attempt to evade the legislation have been rejected,” James stated in an announcement.
- The choice “makes clear that Donald Trump just isn’t above the legislation and should reply for his actions in court docket,” she added.
- Trump has perviously denied the allegations, calling it a “witch hunt.”
- Representatives for the Trump Group didn’t instantly reply to Axios’ request for remark.
[ad_2]
Source link